Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Systemic Adverse Events Associated With Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Medication Use.

Ophthalmology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Bretonneau Hospital, Tours, France. Cardiology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Trousseau Hospital, Tours, France. Unit EA4245, University Francois Rabelais, Tours, France. Department of Pharmacology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Tours, France. Unité Mixte de Recherche 7292, Centre Nationnal de la Recherche Scientifique, Tours, France. Génétique, Immunothérapie, Chimie et Cancer, Department of Medical Research, University François-Rabelais, Tours, France.

JAMA ophthalmology. 2018;(5):557-566

Abstract

IMPORTANCE The systemic safety of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications is still a matter of debate. OBJECTIVE This overview of systematic reviews evaluates systemic adverse events associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF treatments in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, or retinal vein occlusion. DESIGN, EVIDENCE, AND REPORTING This systematic search of PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database includes meta-analyses and systematic reviews. We describe the summary measures of association between anti-VEGF treatments and outcomes reported in each systematic review. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The quality of the systematic reviews was assessed with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) checklist, version 1. FINDINGS We retrieved 21 systematic reviews published between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2016. Of these, 11 analyzed systemic adverse events as the primary outcome. The median (interquartile range) PRISMA and AMSTAR scores were 23 of 27 (15-27) and 8 of 11 (5-11), respectively, but 5 reviews (25%) scored below 20 and 7, respectively. All reviews used an objective scale to assess methodological risk of bias in their included studies, the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool being the most commonly used (16 reviews [76%]). Anti-VEGF treatments did not increase the risk of systemic adverse events when compared with control regimens; similarly, there was no increase in systematic adverse events when treatment was given on a monthly schedule vs an as-needed regimen. Compared with ranibizumab, bevacizumab did not appear to be associated with an increase in the risk of systemic adverse events in the most recent and exhaustive reviews. Compared with control treatments, ranibizumab may be associated with an increase in the risk of nonocular hemorrhage in patients with age-related macular degeneration. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This overview of reviews and meta-analyses suggest that anti-VEGF treatments do not increase the risk of systemic adverse events, but that caution might be advisable in older patients with age-related macular degeneration who may be at higher risk of hemorrhagic events when receiving ranibizumab.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Meta-Analysis

Metadata